Revenue ruling · 2001
Rev. Rul. 2001-60 (Land Preparation, Contemporaneous-Retirement Test)
Rev. Rul. 2001-60, 2001-51 I.R.B. 587
IRS revenue ruling
Audio summary
A short audio walkthrough of this rule: what it says and why it matters for your study.
What it holds
Land preparation costs tied to improvements that will be retired at the same time as those improvements are depreciable over the recovery period of the associated assets. The ruling calls this the contemporaneous-retirement test. Land prep with no retirement event, such as push-up golf greens, stays non-depreciable. This ruling modifies and supersedes Rev. Rul. 55-290.
Why it matters for your study: Site preparation and grading costs appear in nearly every construction project. This ruling gives engineers a clear test for pulling depreciable site work out of non-depreciable land and into a recovery class with real deductions.
Where this comes from
Land is never depreciated. You get no deduction on raw dirt, no matter how much you paid for it. But preparation work is different when it is closely tied to a structure that will eventually be torn out and replaced.
The IRS issued Rev. Rul. 2001-60 to settle this for golf courses. The ruling introduced the contemporaneous-retirement test, which has since become a tool engineers use on commercial properties of all kinds.
What it established
The ruling looked at two kinds of golf greens. Modern greens use layers of sand, gravel, and drainage pipes under the turf. Those drainage layers are real infrastructure with a finite life. When the green is rebuilt, all of it gets torn out. The land prep and the drainage retire at the same time, so the land prep cost is depreciable along with the drainage system.
Old-style push-up greens are just shaped soil. There is no subsurface drainage tied to them. The shaping will not be retired like a structure. So that prep cost stays with the land and produces no deduction.
The ruling modified and superseded the older Rev. Rul. 55-290, which had taken a narrower view.
How it shows up in a study
Site preparation costs are a line item in almost every commercial project. The question in each case is the same one this ruling asks: is this prep so tied to a depreciable improvement that it will be retired when that improvement is retired?
If yes, the cost is depreciable, typically as 15-year land improvement property. Under current bonus depreciation rules, 15-year property has been eligible for large first-year deductions. Getting site work classified correctly adds real dollars to the depreciable basis.
Engineers look at grading tied to drainage, utility trenching for conduit and connections, and similar work. Each one gets the contemporaneous-retirement test.
What it does not mean
The test does not make all site prep depreciable. Work that is general land shaping with no retirement event still stays with the land. The retirement has to be real and tied to a specific depreciable improvement, not just a theoretical future possibility.
It also does not move site prep into short 5 or 7-year buckets. Depreciable land preparation classifies as a land improvement, which typically carries a 15-year life. The ruling opens the door to a deduction, not to an accelerated one beyond what the class life allows.
Primary source
Read the official text for yourself, or share it with your advisor.
- Category
- Asset classification
- Applies to
- All property types
- Status
- Vetted
This page explains a tax authority in plain words. It is not tax advice for your situation. The way this authority applies to your property is reviewed by a licensed tax professional. Citation is provided so you or your advisor can read the primary source.