Court case · 1978

Westroads, Inc. v. Commissioner

69 T.C. 682 (1978), acq. (A.O.D. 1979-173)

U.S. Tax Court

Taxpayer won

Audio summary

A short audio walkthrough of this case: what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters for your study.

The facts

Westroads, Inc., associated with an Omaha shopping center, disputed whether electrical power generating equipment qualified as tangible personal property eligible for the investment tax credit.

What the court decided

The electrical power generating equipment qualified as Section 1245 tangible personal property. The IRS acquiesced in Action on Decision 1979-173.

Why it matters for your study: Westroads supports treating dedicated power-generating equipment as personal property rather than a structural component of the building. The IRS acquiescence makes it stronger authority.

Parts the case looked at

  • electrical power generating equipment

IRS acquiescence: IRS acquiesced. A.O.D. 1979-173 (ATG cite).

Where this comes from

Westroads, Inc., which operated in connection with an Omaha shopping center, had electrical power generating equipment. The company claimed the investment tax credit on it, treating the equipment as tangible personal property.

The IRS disputed the classification. The case went to the U.S. Tax Court in 1978.

What the court decided

The Tax Court ruled for the taxpayer. The electrical power generating equipment qualified as Section 1245 tangible personal property. It was not a structural component of the building.

The IRS then agreed with the decision. It issued Action on Decision 1979-173, acquiescing in the result. That acquiescence means the IRS will follow this outcome in future cases with the same facts. It is one of the stronger signals that the government accepts a taxpayer-favorable classification.

How it shows up in a study

Westroads is cited when a building has dedicated power generating equipment: backup generators, standby power plants, or other electrical generation units that are separate from the building's general electrical distribution system.

The key is what the equipment does. It generates electrical power. It is not a distribution system, not a panel, not wiring. It is the source of power, and as a source it functions more like equipment than like a building component. The IRS acquiescence reinforces this argument.

What it does not mean

Westroads is about power generating equipment, not about general electrical systems. The main panel, conduit, outlets, and general wiring that distribute power through the building stay structural. Those are building components.

It also does not extend to all electrical equipment in a building. The holding is specific to generating equipment. Other electrical items need their own analysis and support from other cases.

Primary source

Read the official text for yourself, or share it with your advisor.

See IRS Pub 5653 (ATG) p.102 (PDF) (opens in a new tab)
Category
Asset classification
Outcome
Taxpayer won
Applies to
All property types
Status
Vetted

This page explains a tax authority in plain words. It is not tax advice for your situation. The way this authority applies to your property is reviewed by a licensed tax professional. Citation is provided so you or your advisor can read the primary source.

Put the law to work on your building.

See your savings range in seconds. Every study cites authorities like this one in its Appendix A.